New technologies have dramatically changed the landscape of
many things, in particular the manner in which we communicate and exchange
information. Two such methods are blogs
and wikis and despite easing communication amongst people, there are inherent
differences between them. Simply put,
according to Rob Edmonds blogs are “most often simple online diaries” whereas
“wikis typically provide a repository of useful knowledge and information.” This is not to say that blogs do not posses
the capacity of providing resourceful information, it is just that blogs are
stylized more like forums. In blogs,
such as the corporate blogs people and even corporations have, individuals can
chronicle everyday activities in a series of new posts with as much detail as
they want. In “Wal-Mart Tastemakers
Write Unfiltered Blogs” Wal-Mart encourages its merchants to speak as frankly
and critically as they want about the products it carries. Wal-Mart believes blogging in this manner
helps them solicit quick feedback from customers on its merchandise. However, they have recognized that the blogs
have become forums for “unvarnished rants.”
Unlike blogs,
wikis give “contributors the power to edit, and presumably improve, the
content.” (Noam Cohen) Wikis have become
popular for they foster a culture of collaboration amongst people working on a
same page. Unlike blogs, wiki
contributors can edit prior content, typically of a certain nature.
In today’s networked world convergence of such Web 2.0
technologies have benefited various enterprises. As I mentioned before, Wal-Mart uses blogs to
collect feedback on the products it sells, information deemed useful when
strategizing marketing plans and making decisions of what products to
carry. Wikis have dramatically altered
the manner in which corporations handle and disseminate internal knowledge
because it “provides a simple way for workers to collaborate on documents and
track changes.” (Edmonds) Internal wikis
serve as a repository of knowledge as I see it.
Very quickly and easily people can change and edit content, in other
words, they collaborate and achieve communication more efficiently. Moreover, given that these technologies
depend on the input of others, information dissemination is more
successful. Wikis in particular can be
used to communicate messages and solicit proposals from an extended network of
individuals who just have to edit and add their thoughts and opinions.
Despite the fact that blogs are published by one
person and does not have the same functionality as wikis do, they too can and
are being used for collaboration.
Wal-Mart is but one example of an external corporate blog. Internal corporate blogs and just typical blogs
permit people to read what others have to say and comment on it. Questions can be posed and answered,
suggestions can be made and problems can be solved through the collaboration of
insights from anyone leaving a comment.
For example, a fellow classmate from this CIS class may read this post
and leave a comment or an inquiry as to why I think as I do, which can lead to
further discussions and even change of opinions. I believe that the root of collaboration is
exchanging information with the learning and passing on information once
unknown to the other.
Given the nature of wikis the possibilities through collaboration are endless. Internal and external corporate wikis are gaining ground, and we have even read about the use of the Diplopedia wiki. Wikis have become an ideal tool for collaboration because of its open source nature. They have been adopted in many ways and it is hard to think of a new use for it. Despite that I think wikis should really be exploited to write more computer programs. Doing so makes it possible to tap into new talent while making it possible for the world population to freely access software.
Given the nature of wikis the possibilities through collaboration are endless. Internal and external corporate wikis are gaining ground, and we have even read about the use of the Diplopedia wiki. Wikis have become an ideal tool for collaboration because of its open source nature. They have been adopted in many ways and it is hard to think of a new use for it. Despite that I think wikis should really be exploited to write more computer programs. Doing so makes it possible to tap into new talent while making it possible for the world population to freely access software.